I can hear you calling!
You may have heard the word transducer applied to speaker drivers and microphones. Transduction
is a fancy word for conversion and, just as a speaker converts electrical energy into mechanical energy that we perceive as
sound waves, the microphone converts sound waves into electrical energy.
The two main types (here we go again!) of microphone are dynamic and capacitor.
Most speakers and microphones are based on the deceptively simple principle of electro-mechanics, that if
one passes a piece of wire through a magnetic field, an electrical current will be created in the wire. Conversely, if we
pass an electrical current through a wire that is in a magnetic field, it will try to move. Nearly all electrical motors and
generators are based on this principle. (There are other ways of converting electricity into motion and motion into electricity
- the piezo crystal springs to mind - but I shall ignore them for the time being!)
The first working microphone was the carbon microphone invented by Edison in 1876 and was two plates
with carbon granules between them. A voltage is applied across the metal plates, causing a small current to flow
through the carbon. When the plates vibrate in sympathy with sound, this current changes.
But in the studio, we use the condenser mic and the dynamic, moving-coil mic. There was some limited
use of ribbon mics and many reacent entries into this section of the market have been of very poor quality and more of
a gimmick than a useful series of tools. There are however many good ribbons out there from the more responsible manufacturers.
No, don't worry! I am not going to tell you how microphones work! If you don't know, look it up.
A technical description to be cut and pasted into somebody's homework is not the purpose of this website.
I am however, going to talk about microphones in general and mention a few that are my favorites. I
might even make you think again about what mic to put where.
At the moment, the whole of the microphone market has become a terrible mish-mash as a direct result of the
importing of very cheap (but not so chearful) Far-Eastern products at very low prices.
Well, I say very low, very low compared to what we were paying a few years ago.
A U87 for £100?
You can now get condenser mics for as little at £100 that on first listening,
sound very good indeed. They sound sharp and clear and, as they say in the reviews in amateur recording magazines, 'cut
through a mix.' So, if they are that good as some people claim, why do professionals still not use them? Is it
our old friend the snob effect?
Or is something else going on here?
When you get to work with a top quality microphone and desk, you get used
to 'pulling' things out of the signal to get an effect, or pushing parts of the frequency spectrum back without loosing anything,
without it sounding as if something strange is going on and (most importantly) without distortion. There would be no
point in bringing the highs forward in a voice, piano, or drum overheads, if the result was loads of edgy distortion flooding
Let's be clear here - these budget mics (and their budget counterparts in
the rest of the signal chain, come to that) distort.
As they say in Yorkshire, "You don't get ought for nought!" They may
sound pretty damn good for the price, but it is when you try to work with that sound that things start to go wrong.
You may want to pull the highs on the overheads forward by 12dB and then bring them right down in the mix. Well, you
can't because they distort and pulling the highs forward by that amount just shows up all the distortion.
So these mics and all the other super-cheap budget stuff that is flooding
the market may be great for the amateur who just wants to hear a sound, but they do not work for the professional or even
for the amateur with somewhat elevated expectations.
However, several words of warning here -
If a component in the signal chain is of poor quality, then everything will
be brought down to that quality. A chain is exactly that, a chain. If there is a ropey mic-pre or eq in there,
then you will not hear much difference between a high class mic and some piece of cheap tat. That goes for monitors
as well, by the way!
Using cheap pieces of equipment 'uneducates' the ears. If you keep
hearing distorted highs, then you begin to expect that sound and even confuse it with genuine clarity. This can end
up with you not being able to tell the difference between the distorted sound of a cheap mic or other component and the top-end
clarity of a well-built mic.
Last, but by no means least, watch out for badging!
Now, if you don't know what badging is, this is the practise of taking some
item and sticking your logo (or badge) on it.
This can be a straight logo stick or it can be that the manufacturer builds
everything themselves, except the mic capsule (i.e. the important bit!)
There are all sorts of shades in between,
such as taking a cheap mic and replacing some of the parts to improve performance, or putting the mic in a nicer housing
and giving it a better presentation box.
The problem is one can never be sure if a product is of good quality, until
one has used it for a while. Mics in particular, only really show their true colours during the mix and mastering processes.
It is then, when you are working on the mix, that you discover whether the quality of parts of the signal stand up to deeper
Cheap and Good!
There are some absolute budget gems in the condenser microphone world out
there. And not in the places you would imagine either! Let's start with the new stuff that you can buy in the
Neumann makes a pile of good, cheap mics. People tend to just see
the sticker price on an M149 and assume that all Neumann mics are going to break the bank. Well, if any manufacturer
makes fantastic mics for very low prices, that manufacturer is Neumann! The list of good mics that cost less than £500
each is fairly long, but I'll start with a star, the KMS105. This is originally a live mic, but it works brilliantly
in the studio, especially for rock and jazz voices and costs only £325 by the usual mail order companies. If a good
stereo pair is what you desire, the KM 184 stereo set costs just £715. The BCM705 gives good warm vocals. Yes,
I know it is a broadcast mic, but it works really well on singers, as well as vapid DJs called Kevin.
If your pocket book can run to the TLM series, then there is a bewildering
array of really great microphones from Neumann and to my ears, the TLM103 sounds like the U87 (well, the new version of the
87 anyway) and costs less than half. Things to avoid from Neumann are the accessories, which are just wildly over-priced
- unless you really feel that you should pay over £200 for a cradle or a staggering £40 for a two-bit mic clamp!
DPA make some great budget mics around their sub-miniature series that allow
you to use them in places other mics do not go. Top of my list is the 4061, which is so small, it can be 'blue-tacked'
onto a violin bridge without affecting the sound. It is also the most genuinely omni-directional microphone I have ever
tried, making it an ideal candidate to double as a test mic. The 4061 (and its high sensitivity brother the 4060) make
ideal mics for Decca Tree arrays, boundary mics and for kunstkopf stereo recordings. At £215 pounds each, these
are really a bargain!
Unfortunately, AKG has been blotting its copybook lately with some cheap
imports, but hidden in junk basket of cheap tat at the end of the aisle is a series of real microphones, the 300 (so called
'Blue Line') series, which is a body plus capsule system. The 300 body come bundled with the cardioid 91 capsule as
the AKG C391 and costs about £180. This is a good, sweet-sounding mic that works for things like piano, overheads and
orchestras. It lacks the 'sparkle' that comes with a very fast response rate, but sometimes that is a good thing.
Other capsules with other characteristics are available, but they cost quite a good bit more and are not really worth
the extra, unless you really need them.
On the dynamic side of things, there is not much to say. The cheap
imports are truly dreadful. The good ones all cost a great deal. The only exception I can think of is the Audix
D-Series for drums and the D6 in particular, which sells for about £160 and is the only mic I use for kick drum.
Old Gold resold!
There are some lovely, old dynamic mics out there, the problem is for the
newcomer to the scene, that spotting a bargain requires an encyclopedic knowledge of microphones of the 60's and 70's.
Just because a mic is old or even carries a classic name, does not mean it is any good. Nearly all the leading brands
also carried budget stuff that got sold with domestic reel-to-reel tape recorders. These were nearly all complete and
utter rubbish that sound as if they had been swallowed by the cat (and are still in there!)
Here is a list of some gems to watch out for. If your favourite old
mic is not on the list, it just means I do not know it - or I do know it and do not like it (e.g. the AKG D12).
D224, D202 D222 and the D200 all used the patented AKG two-way transducer
system and are superb mics for voice, horns, parts of the drum kit and lots of other things. The 200 series are fantastic
snare mics. Also watch out for the D1200, which was AKG's answer to the SM57, only far better!
Of course, everyone would like to get their hands on an original C12, but
the number of fake copies floating around is pretty massive, so you have been warned. In particular, watch out for offer
of old C12s that have been 'rebuilt' or otherwise improved. Very many of these are Chinese copies that someone
has doctored to look like an original. Sometimes the bodies are original, but the insides have been replaced with the
insides from a cheap copy. The old insides were either totally shot, or put inside the body of a copy, therefore making
two C12s out of just one!
The C12 was also sold as an OEM version by Siemans as the SM203 and the
SM204 and by Telefunken as the M251 and the ELA-M251.
Electrovoice produced more beautiful mics than I could possibly list here. Watch out for the DS35,
the standard vocal mic for live TV in the 60's. Also look out for the 664 'Sound Spot' which not only sounds silky
and smooth, but really looks fantastic. Two of these as audience mics are unbelievably good, compared to some of the
mics we get today!
Altogether, EV mics were mechanically better made and as a result, looked better than most others.
You can always find a use for any of the RE series and often (with the exception of ever-popular the RE20) they can still
be picked up for not too much money.
Everybody has heard of the SM57 and the SM58, but Shure made more brilliant
microphones than I could possibly list here, so I'll just highlight the ones that tend to be sold for a small fraction of
their true worth and in their day, were (and of course still are) microphones built for the very highest professional standards.
If you are looking for the best in ribbon mics, look for the Shure Unitron
(later called the Uniron to avoid being confused with a telescope manufacturer of that name). This carried the model
number 330 and 333 and was based on the earlier 300 and 315 - all of them good! The most famous of all ribbon mics
ever built was the SM33 and was the mic used for so many years by Johnny Carson and Shure even had a special one made
for him with the inscription "Johnny's mic . . . Not Ed's . . . Not Fred's . . ."
Shure made very high quality dynamic mics, such as the SM54 and the SM59
that seem to have been forgotten today, but still make brilliant mics for all kinds of things, especially drums and hi-hats
Altogether, Shure made hundreds of types and models, incuding some condenser models that I have seen sell
fairly cheaply, such as the SM80 and the SM102 that used to be extremely poular in their day.